Written and checked by Rhian PetrossianDocuments editor

The operator bars three countries; the long list belongs to NetEnt

Three countries make up the whole of this operator’s own territorial exclusion: Russia, Belarus and Georgia, clause 3 of terms the document dates 2 May 2022. The lists of thirty and forty names that circulate under this brand sit one section further down and were written by NetEnt.

What each operator writes in its own terms about the company behind the brand, how long a withdrawal takes to process, when identity documents are requested and how much may be taken out. Every figure carries the clause it was copied from and the date it was read. An empty cell means we could not read a document that answers the question — it is not a zero, and it is not a permission.
Casino	Operator	Processing	Before ID check	Withdrawal limit	Visit
Vavepaid placement	TechOptions Group B.V.	up to 3 days cl. 8.1	case by case	from 50,000 USDT in instalments cl. 8.8	Visit
Rocketpot	Danneskjold Ventures B.V.	not published	US$2,500	5,000 USD /month cl. 11.5
Bitcasino.io	Moon Technologies B.V.	not published	2,500 EUR	1,000,000 USDT /week cl. 6.10
Sportsbet.io	not published	not published	2,500 EUR	not published
Empire.io	Pixel Entertainment Limited	not published	2,000 USDT	not published
Metaspins	3-102-959384 SRL	not published	case by case	not published
Rainbet	RBGAMING N.V.	not published	case by case	not published
Bitsler	Oyine N.V.	not published	case by case	not published
Wolf.bet	Cipher Games Ltd	not published	case by case	not published
Jackbit	Data Link Digital B.V.	up to 1 days cl. 12	case by case	10,000 USD /week cl. 12

The operator’s own exclusion runs to three countries

Clause 3 of the general terms holds the entire territorial ban in a single sentence: “Access to the following residents or access from the following territory onto the website is not allowed - Russia, Belarus, Georgia.” The document self-dates 2 May 2022, and we read it on 2 September 2026 from a stored copy of the operator’s own address.

Three names. That is the complete list of people this operator says it will refuse as customers, in the version of the contract available to read.

Now set it beside the answer that circulates for this brand, which typically runs to thirty or forty countries and leads with the United States and the United Kingdom. Those names are genuine and they are in the same document. They sit one section lower, they were drafted by a different company, and they restrict a different thing.

Section 4 is a supplier’s list, and it says so in its own heading

Section 4 is titled AVAILABILITY OF GAMES and opens with the line “Netent Casino games terms:”. Everything beneath that heading belongs to NetEnt, a game studio, and sets out the territories into which the studio will supply its titles. It is a condition between two companies, reprinted by the operator inside its own terms.

Three tiers sit under it, all in the 2 May 2022 document:

4.1, absolute restriction: the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Spain, France and Italy.
4.2, blacklisted territories: thirty-six names, running from Afghanistan, Albania and Algeria through Australia, Hong Kong, Israel, Pakistan, the Philippines, Singapore and Taiwan to Zimbabwe.
4.3, regulated territories: eighteen names, including Belgium, Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland and Mexico, which the studio permits “only … if receipt of a license from the local regulator which has been seen and approved by NetEnt”.

Clauses 4.4 and 4.5 add further conditions attached to individual branded games.

One detail belongs to anyone checking this against the source. Clause 4.1 prints the second name as “United Kingdo”, and the missing letter is the operator’s own, reproduced here as it stands. Search that document for “United Kingdom” and clause 4.1 stays hidden, which is an efficient way to misread the section entirely.

The distinction is worth holding onto. A supplier restriction governs which games a studio allows an operator to serve in a territory. Clause 3 governs who may hold an account. Reprinting the first under the heading “restricted countries” multiplies the operator’s own exclusion by more than ten and credits it with lists it did not write.

Two further lists get folded into the same answer

A third layer sits inside the withdrawal section. Clause 12 records the countries where Visa is unavailable as a payment route, nine of them: the USA, Australia, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia and Singapore. It then names twenty-nine countries, almost all European, where Mastercard is supported. Those are card-scheme conditions describing a card, and they arrive in the terms because payments live there.

A fourth layer sits outside the contract altogether. The promotion page headed General Rules for Winnings, stored on 27 January 2026, bars free spins and free bets for residents of seven countries: Russia, Belarus, Poland, Latvia, Georgia, Peru and Pakistan. Play is permitted and the bonus is refused. Poland, Latvia and Peru appear in this layer and in no other.

Four lists, then, produced by three different parties, doing four different jobs. Collapsed into one line, they answer a question nobody asked.

What a contract settles, and what a legislature settles

Two questions arrive here dressed in the same words. Will this operator take me as a customer? And does the law where I live permit me to place the bet? A casino’s terms answer the first. Authority over the second belongs to a legislature, and a Curaçao contract written in 2022 has none of it.

Clause 3 answers the first question for three countries and stops. On the second, this site states a position for no country at all: the answer turns on national and sometimes regional law, it moves on its own schedule, and it is the reader’s own jurisdiction that decides. The operator gives the same instruction in miniature on its welcome promotion, in a bracket beside the game the free spins are tied to, telling the reader to make sure that game is available in their jurisdiction.

So a reader in a country missing from every list above has learned something narrow and real: the operator’s contract, as published four years ago, records no objection. Everything else remains a question for the law that reader lives under.

The date attached to the list is the most useful thing about it

Nothing in the document read reserves a right to change the country list without notice. What governs instead is clause 2, which covers the whole contract: the terms “may be changed by the Company when such need occurs”, the company “will do our best to notify our Players of any significant changes by email”, and players are recommended to revisit the page regularly. A list revisable at the operator’s initiative under a best-efforts notice, in other words, and the version above is four years and four months old.

Later editions certainly exist. The terms address on the operator’s domain returns HTTP 200 in stored copies as late as 9 June 2026. The wording on those pages arrives at runtime from a content interface that answered our capture machine with HTTP 403 and the header cf-mitigated: challenge on 2 September 2026, which describes the state of our check and carries no information about which territories the operator serves. The current list therefore stands unread here, and every country named above travels with the date 2 May 2022.

Which is the practical instruction this page ends on: open the operator’s terms in force on the day money would go in, and read clause 3 rather than a reprint of clause 4. The identity clause that operates in every territory alike is under what verification the contract reserves, operators read on these same rules are compared under what each one publishes about identity checks, and the shortlists split by reason for leaving are on the alternatives page.

Questions people actually type

Which countries does Jackbit restrict?

In the terms available to read, three: Russia, Belarus and Georgia, named in clause 3 of a document the operator self-dates 2 May 2022 and which we read on 2 September 2026. That clause is the operator’s own exclusion. Longer lists appear in clause 4 of the same document under the heading Netent Casino games terms, and those belong to a game supplier.

Is Jackbit available in the US?

The United States is absent from the operator’s own clause 3 and present in clause 4.1, the NetEnt absolute restriction, in the 2 May 2022 document. Clause 12 separately records that Visa is not supported for customers in the USA. Whether a US resident may lawfully place a bet is a question of US federal and state law, which no casino contract answers and which this site takes no position on.

Is Jackbit available in the UK?

The United Kingdom is absent from clause 3 and appears twice inside the supplier section: in clause 4.1, printed by the operator as “United Kingdo”, and in clause 4.3 as a regulated territory NetEnt serves only against a local licence. British law on remote gambling is set by the Gambling Act and its regulator rather than by these terms, and nothing here says a British reader may play.

Can players from India use Jackbit?

India is absent from the operator’s clause 3 and absent from the NetEnt lists in clause 4. It appears once, in clause 12, among nine countries where Visa is not supported as a payment route. That is a card-scheme limit inside the payments section rather than a territorial ban, and Indian law on online gaming is decided by Indian legislation, state by state.

Can the restricted list change without notice?

No sentence specific to the country list exists in the document read. Clause 2 governs the whole contract instead: the terms may be changed by the company when such need occurs, the company will do its best to notify players of significant changes by email, and players are recommended to revisit the page regularly. So the list is revisable at the operator’s initiative under a best-efforts notice.

Why do other sites list forty Jackbit restricted countries?

Because clause 4 of the same terms reprints NetEnt’s supply conditions, which run to five absolute names, thirty-six blacklisted territories and eighteen regulated ones. Those describe where a studio will send its games. Clause 3 describes who the operator will take as a customer. Both sit in one document, and the second is the one that names three countries.