Written and checked by Rhian PetrossianDocuments editor

Eight of the ten publish a country list, from one name to fifty-eight

Eight rows in the comparison column carry a countable territory list. The longest, at Metaspins, names 58 places; two cells hold a single name each, and neither of those two is a short policy — one is a pointer to a schedule that was not supplied, the other a document that ran out mid-list. Between the eight, 96 different places get named and none of them appears in all eight.

Eight cells in the country column carry a number. The numbers run from 1 to 58, and the two at the bottom mean something entirely different from the two at the top.

What each operator writes in its own terms about the company behind the brand, how long a withdrawal takes to process, when identity documents are requested and how much may be taken out. Every figure carries the clause it was copied from and the date it was read. An empty cell means we could not read a document that answers the question — it is not a zero, and it is not a permission.
Casino	Operator	Processing	Before ID check	Withdrawal limit	Visit
Vavewe recommend	Latcas B.V.	up to 3 days cl. 8.1	case by case	from 50,000 USDT in instalments cl. 8.8	Visit
Rocketpot	Danneskjold Ventures B.V.	not published	US$2,500	5,000 USD /month cl. 11.5
Bitcasino.io	Moon Technologies B.V.	not published	2,500 EUR	1,000,000 USDT /week cl. 6.10
Sportsbet.io	MBet Solutions N.V.	not published	2,500 EUR	not published
Empire.io	Pixel Entertainment Limited	not published	2,000 USDT	not published
Metaspins	Metaspins N.V.	not published	case by case	not published
Rainbet	RBGAMING N.V.	not published	case by case	not published
Bitsler	Oyine N.V.	not published	case by case	not published
Wolf.bet	Cipher Games Ltd	not published	case by case	not published
Jackbit	Data Link Digital B.V.	up to 1 days cl. 12	case by case	10,000 USD /week cl. 12

The eight, longest first

Operator	Places named	What the clause is
Metaspins	58	a passage inside the general terms
Wolf.bet	48	a prohibited-jurisdictions clause, qualified by "including but not limited to"
Rocketpot	34	a warranty the player gives about their own residence
Sportsbet.io	17	a restricted-jurisdictions document of its own
Empire.io	12	a passage inside the help-centre terms
Rainbet	11	a list of countries of residence and of access
Bitcasino.io	1	a named country, plus a pointer to a schedule held elsewhere
Bitsler	1	a list that runs out inside the captured text

Two rows hold nothing. Vave, the paid one, publishes no territorial list that has been read here, so it carries no figure and enters none of the arithmetic below — an admission about the reading rather than a property of the operator. The subject of this site publishes three names of its own, and the reason they sit on a separate page rather than in this column is that nearly every write-up of the brand merges them with three other lists that belong to other parties.

A drawing of a raccoon in a green waistcoat holding up a phone that is running a slot game with three reels, pointing away with its free paw while an arrow crosses the bottom of the screen — A drawing, made for this page — an illustration rather than anyone’s screen, and the game on the phone is invented for the picture rather than copied from an operator. It stands for the one checkable thing in this section: a redirect is a standing instruction, configured by whoever holds both names and served on every request, so the reader who taps an old link is carried somewhere else while the game keeps running. Requested from our own capture machine on 2 September 2026, jackbit.com, www.jackbit.com, jackbit.io and jackbit.co each answered HTTP 301 and pointed at jack.com.

Why the two ones are not short policies

This is the trap in the column, and it catches people who read the number without opening the document.

The Bitcasino.io clause names Japan and stops. Immediately around it the terms describe the restricted jurisdictions as a list held elsewhere and linked, and the linked schedule was not supplied in the text that was read. So the cell says one because one name was printed at the address that was opened. Everything else that clause may reach sits behind a reference this reading never resolved.

The Bitsler cell says one for a plainer reason. The list ran out. Only American Samoa was visible in the captured text, and a list that terminates mid-sentence produces a count of what survived rather than a count of what the operator wrote.

Neither one belongs on a scale with the 58.

The Sportsbet.io help centre page titled Restricted Jurisdictions, with the opening paragraph and the start of the country list — A territorial list published as a document of its own, reachable through the help centre under Other and Terms and Conditions, rather than buried inside a numbered clause. Its opening sentence says which kind of list it is: countries restricted by the operator’s own gaming licence, whose residents are prohibited from registering and playing. The visible part opens at Afghanistan and reaches Haiti without leaving the first screen, and Curaçao is on it — the jurisdiction whose licence this same paragraph names as the reason the list exists. The operator this site is named after excludes three countries in clause 3, and its long country tables belong to a game supplier.

The shape of the clause matters as much as its length. Sportsbet.io publishes its restricted territories as a document of its own with its own address, which is the arrangement worth looking for on any site under consideration: a standalone schedule can be checked, dated and re-checked, while a paragraph buried at clause 7 of a general agreement can be edited without anything visible changing. Wolf.bet sits at the other extreme of shape, because its list is introduced by the words including but not limited to — a clause that names 48 places and reserves the right to mean more.

What the eight agree on

Ninety-six different places are named across the eight lists. Not one of the 96 appears in all eight.

Two reach six: the United Kingdom and the United States, both absent only from the two artefact cells and from one other. Australia, Curaçao, France, North Korea, the Netherlands and Yemen reach five. Germany, Spain, Iraq, Malta, Iran and Syria reach four.

Below that the agreement dissolves. Fifty-six of the 96 places are named by exactly one of the eight operators, and they are not spread evenly: 29 of those single mentions come from Metaspins and 14 from Wolf.bet. The two longest lists are long because they are idiosyncratic, not because they are thorough.

A reader can take one practical thing from that distribution. Where a country appears in six of eight lists, it is being caught by something broad — a sanctions posture, a payment network, a licensing condition — and moving between brands is unlikely to change the answer. Where it appears in one, a single company sat down and wrote a specific clause about that market, and the other seven did not.

Section 11 of the Rocketpot terms, with clause 11.4 highlighted by the browser and clauses 11.3 and 11.5 above and below it — The top tier of the identity column, in the operator’s own words: clause 11.4 puts a document check on withdrawals above 0.05 BTC or 2,500 dollars, and the sentence after it keeps the same right for smaller ones. Two neighbours matter as much. Clause 11.5 caps payment at 5,000 dollars a month once a win reaches 5,000, which sits above the document threshold. Clause 11.3 promises every request processed within 72 hours — a published window, read on this capture, later than the day the table cell was filled, which is why that cell is still empty. The coloured mark on 11.4 is the browser’s: the capture was taken to that point by a text anchor.

The four lists that get merged into one answer

Everything above concerns the alternatives. The subject of this site is where the merging happens, and it is worth a paragraph here because it is the commonest error written about this brand.

Clause 3 of the 2022 terms disallows residents of, and access from, Russia, Belarus and Georgia. Three countries, and that is the entire operator exclusion in the document. Section 4, headed AVAILABILITY OF GAMES, opens with the line about NetEnt casino games and carries the supplier's own restrictions. Section 12 adds limits imposed by card schemes. The promotions add a fourth group, covering who may activate an offer rather than who may hold an account.

Four lists, four authors, one brand. Only the first of the four is the operator speaking about its own market. The separation, clause by clause and including the operator's own typo in clause 4.1, is at which countries are actually excluded.

What a name in one of these clauses does and does not settle

It settles that a company has written down that it does not serve a place. That is a fact about a contract, it is checkable, and it is the only thing this column reports.

It settles nothing about law. What any government permits is a separate question with separate sources, decided by parties who publish nothing in these documents, and no sentence on this site converts a missing name into a permission.

It settles nothing about the cashier, which applies its own territory rules at the moment money moves rather than at the moment an account opens.

And it settles nothing about next month. These are commercial documents amended without announcement, and every figure above describes the copy that was opened.

Who the company behind each of the eight clauses is, and which of the ten permits resolve in a register, is at three authorities behind ten rows. What each of them commits to on the way out is at ceilings and windows. The rules behind every cell are at how this site reads.

Questions people actually type

Which Jackbit alternative excludes the most countries?

Metaspins, with 58 places in the territorial passage of its terms. Wolf.bet follows at 48 and Rocketpot at 34. Twenty-nine of the 58 at Metaspins are named by none of the other seven lists, which makes it the most distinctive clause in the set as well as the longest.

Two of the cells say one country. Does that mean those operators accept almost everybody?

No, and both ones are artefacts of reading rather than findings about policy. The Bitcasino.io clause names Japan and then points at a separate schedule of restricted jurisdictions which it links rather than prints, so one name is what was countable. The Bitsler list ran out inside the captured text with only American Samoa visible. In both cases the figure records how far the reading got.

How many countries does Jackbit itself exclude?

Three in its own clause: Russia, Belarus and Georgia, under clause 3 of the terms self-dated 2 May 2022, which disallows both residence and access. The lists of thirty and forty names circulating under this brand come from a different section of the same document, headed AVAILABILITY OF GAMES and opening with a line about NetEnt casino games, which makes them a supplier's restrictions rather than the operator's.

Does a country missing from a clause mean the operator will take me?

It does not, and no page here says otherwise. A territorial clause is one company writing down where it has decided not to trade. Payment providers apply territory rules of their own at the moment money moves, an operator can decline an account for unrelated reasons, and a clause can be amended without notice. A name in the list settles the refusal; an absence settles nothing.