Skip to content
Standing Record
Our partnerVave Open Vave

Written and checked by Rhian PetrossianDocuments editor

Jackbit became Jack.com, and the counterparty changed with it

One press release, three company footers, three licence numbers across four years. The newest permission carries an issue date of 15 May 2026, two weeks ahead of the announcement. Read in date order, the documents say more than the announcement does.

Two kinds of page come back when the old name is typed into a search box. One was written before the summer of 2026 and describes a brand under a name it has stopped using. The other mentions the new name once, then quotes figures gathered under the old one. Between them sits a run of dated documents showing three legal entities, three licence numbers and one press release across four years.

The order is the finding here.

What each operator writes in its own terms about the company behind the brand, how long a withdrawal takes to process, when identity documents are requested and how much may be taken out. Every figure carries the clause it was copied from and the date it was read. An empty cell means we could not read a document that answers the question — it is not a zero, and it is not a permission.
CasinoOperatorProcessingBefore ID checkWithdrawal limitVisit
Vavepaid placementTechOptions Group B.V.up to 3 days cl. 8.1case by casefrom 50,000 USDT in instalments cl. 8.8Visit
RocketpotDanneskjold Ventures B.V.not publishedUS$2,5005,000 USD /month cl. 11.5
Bitcasino.ioMoon Technologies B.V.not published2,500 EUR1,000,000 USDT /week cl. 6.10
Sportsbet.ionot publishednot published2,500 EURnot published
Empire.ioPixel Entertainment Limitednot published2,000 USDTnot published
Metaspins3-102-959384 SRLnot publishedcase by casenot published
RainbetRBGAMING N.V.not publishedcase by casenot published
BitslerOyine N.V.not publishedcase by casenot published
Wolf.betCipher Games Ltdnot publishedcase by casenot published
JackbitData Link Digital B.V.up to 1 days cl. 12case by case10,000 USD /week cl. 12

What the announcement said, and when

The rename was announced on 29 May 2026 through GlobeNewswire, release identifier 3303648, under the headline “Jackbit Rebrands as Jack.com, Launches Volume 2.0 Platform Upgrade”. Its dateline reads New York City, 29 May 2026, timestamped 09:48 ET, above a source line reading “Source: Jackbit”. That page opened in full on 2 September 2026, making it one of the few items here read live rather than from a stored copy.

The factual content is short. The company says it was founded in 2022, that it holds a Curaçao gaming licence, and that the platform covers sportsbook betting, casino games, live casino, esports, original titles, tournaments and crypto payment solutions. A second half lists the upgrade it calls Volume 2.0, from a rebuilt wallet to peer-to-peer tipping.

Two silences weigh as much as the contents. The release stops short of a licence number, and it stops short of naming any company at all. Its only quotation is attributed to “the company” rather than to a person, so an announcement about corporate identity arrives with no corporate identity in it.

One sentence is the one readers came for, so here it is as printed: “Existing Jackbit users will experience no disruption to their accounts during the transition.” A claim by the company, quoted as a claim. Read the noun closely. The release says accounts. The word balances is absent from the whole document, and it stays absent from this page.

Three companies, three licence numbers, four years

Where it was readCompanyRegistrationLicenceAuthorityIssue date
General Terms, clause 1, document dated 2 May 2022Ryker B.V.1541861668/JAZCuraçao eGamingundated in the clause
Footer text served 2 April 2026Ryker B.V154186OGL/2024/1800/1049Curaçao Gaming Authority14 August 2024
Footer text served 30 August 2026Data Link Digital B.V.164124OGL/2024/1562/1139Curaçao Gaming Authority15 May 2026

Read the second column downwards. The money moved with the name. Under the 2022 terms the payment agent was Ryker Development Limited of Larnaca, Cyprus, registration HE412288; the footer served on 30 August 2026 gives DATALINK TECH LIMITED of Limassol, HE 494415. Two companies, two payment agents, two Cyprus addresses.

A word on what the table proves. We observed which content key the operator’s page requested on which date, and read the footer text it returned. That is the operator describing itself, at two moments, in its own words. A corporate registry extract it is not, and the live footer stayed unreadable on 2 September 2026.

The permission was issued two weeks before the name

Line up two dates. The licence number in the later footer, OGL/2024/1562/1139, carries an issue date of 15 May 2026. The rename was announced on 29 May 2026.

Fourteen days separate them.

That ordering is the part nobody has reported. The results page treats the event as new signage; the documents read as a change of licence holder, announced under a new name once the paperwork existed. Which is cause and which effect lies beyond what these documents settle. What does follow: a player who opened an account under the old brand now holds it against a different company, under a different permission number, and learned this from a release that mentioned neither fact.

What the old address does when you type it

Checked by header request from the capture server on 2 September 2026, jackbit.com answers HTTP 301 and redirects to jack.com. So does the www form. So do jackbit.io and jackbit.co. Paths carry across too: the terms address on the old domain redirects to the matching address on the new one.

An earlier line in our own working brief said the old domain had stopped answering. That was wrong, and it is corrected here rather than quietly dropped. The old bookmark still lands, and it lands on the new brand.

The email addresses tell a slower story. Five were readable in the operator’s page markup from a copy stored on 31 January 2026, and every one of them sat on the old domain, as does the contact address in the May release. Whatever the frontage says, the post still goes to the old name.

Why anything written before June 2026 needs rereading

Three things moved in one season: the brand name, the licence number, and the company holding it. A review published in March 2026 could have been accurate on all three that week, and stale on all three by June.

The primary document has the same difficulty, which is worse. The terms available to read are self-dated 2 May 2022. Newer editions exist, since the operator’s terms address returns stored copies as late as 9 June 2026, but each is an empty application shell that fetches its text at runtime from an interface closed to us. Every clause number quoted anywhere on this site therefore carries that 2022 date. The same caution runs through the promotion pages, taken apart under what the bonus terms commit to.

Whether the territorial exclusion in clause 3 of those 2022 terms reaches any particular reader lies beyond what this reading establishes, so read the operator’s current terms before depositing.

What could be read from here, and what could not

Every path tried on 2 September 2026 returned HTTP 403 with the response header cf-mitigated: challenge and a Cloudflare interstitial titled “Just a moment…”. A real browser held the page for 100 seconds and the screen stayed put. That is a client filter and a fact about our own check; reading it as a geo-block, or as evidence about which countries the operator serves, would be an invention.

Everything else here came from stored copies of the operator’s own addresses, each with its snapshot date printed rather than smoothed away. The licence number stays unresolved, because the Curaçao portal offers a certificate lookup with no search by domain, company or number. That attempt is set out under the four questions inside “is Jackbit legit”.

If the search began with a sign-in screen that stopped working, the causes divide into three groups, one of them written into the contract: what the terms say about account access. Surface by surface there is the full reading, and next to it the alternatives split by reason for leaving.

Questions people actually type

Why did Jackbit change its name?
The press release of 29 May 2026 gives a reason of one word: a rebrand, presented alongside a platform upgrade the company calls Volume 2.0. It offers no commercial explanation beyond that, and it names no executive. What the operator’s own footers add is that the licence holder changed in the same season, from Ryker B.V to Data Link Digital B.V.
Did my Jackbit account move to Jack.com?
The company states that it did. The sentence in the release of 29 May 2026 reads: “Existing Jackbit users will experience no disruption to their accounts during the transition.” That is a claim by the company, quoted here as a claim. The release uses the word accounts; the word balances is absent from it, so nothing about balances is asserted on this page.
Is jackbit.com still working?
Checked from our capture server on 2 September 2026, jackbit.com answered with a clean HTTP 301 redirect to jack.com. The same held for the www form, for jackbit.io and for jackbit.co. An old bookmark therefore lands the reader on the new brand rather than on an error page.
Is Jack.com safe if the brand is new?
The brand is new; the platform dates itself to 2022. Safety is a separate question from age, and it splits into four smaller ones: licence, operator identity, payment behaviour and outside proof. Those are taken apart one at a time on the page about whether Jackbit is legit.